E-mail catch-up has resumed in time for le holiday. I heart the new Gmail themes. (Ninja, for nowsies!)
I had none of Matt Cheney's qualms while reading The Kingdom on the Waves, but I do remember wishing I'd been able to read the book all at once, as one experience, rather than as a divided one. Whatever your own feelings about Octavian Nothing (I or II), it's well worth reading Matt's thoughtful review.
Science fiction is undead, plus several essaylets about what the future of SF might hold from the likes of Kim Stanley Robinson, William Gibson, and Ursula Le Guin, among others. (Hat tip to Leda!)
Betsy Bird reviews the film adaption of The Boy in Striped Pajamas, and I’ve no doubt the review is better than both the book and movie in question: While many children’s books have sought to teach young readers about Hitler’s greatest atrocity, few have been quite as divisive as John Boyne’s 2006 novel The Boy in the Striped Pajamas. This novel has caused some readers to sing its praises to the heavens while others desire nothing more than to rake out their own eyeballs after a chapter or two.
It makes me happy when insanely rich people do stuff like this, and by this I mean Madeleine Pickens saving more than 30,000 wild horses and burros from euthanasia. The pictures of these horses are AMAZING. (Someday I will so live our my childhood dream to go to Chincoteague Island.)
My hero Lewis Hyde profiled in the NYT, with some tantalizing talk about the book he’s working on (finished with? almost?) about the cultural commonspace. Can’t. Wait.
What books for 13-year-old boys should be, by a 13-year-old boy in PW: The vampire was always depicted as a menacing badass. That is the kind of book teenage boys want to read. Also good: books with videogame-style plots involving zombie attacks, alien attacks, robot attacks or any excuse to shoot something. Of course, he also says not to skimp on the politics.
As Patrick French’s nuanced and generous but often dispiriting biography shows, there’s not much to like or praise about V.S. Naipaul as a human being. He starts life as a twerp, then fairly quickly becomes a jerk and ends up an old sourpuss. The best overall epithet for him is infantile — though one shouldn’t neglect the claims of such adjectives as whiney, narcissistic, insulting, needy, callous, impolite, cruel, vengeful, indecisive, miserly, exploitative, snobbish, sadistic, self-pitying and ungrateful. Of course, his is, to some extent, the modern artistic sensibility writ very, very large. But even our favorite monsters and divas — Picasso, Waugh, Callas, Brando — are never as smarmy and nasty as Naipaul. He can make a spoiled 3-year-old look mature.
Seeing as Naipaul’s still with us, and Dirda goes on to (let’s face it, aptly) characterize him as "increasingly blimpish, less a cultural scourge than a mean-spirited, intolerant crank," I’m not answering anything without a recognized caller ID for a few days if I’m the critic in question.
I hate it when deadlines attack all at once. I’ve got a lecture to think out and write, a Dear Aunt Gwenda column to finish, a workshop submission to generate (20 pages of new fiction… I’m thinking now is the time to tackle the big fun SF middle grade thing and we shall see), aaaaaaand something else I’m forgetting. Oh, a Crafty Monday topic to host on our program’s private, student-run message board. Plus, you know, reshelving all these books and junk once the front room is Officially Together. (Getting there.) Miscellaneous, etcetera, et al.
But I think this is the last big slew of vicious swarming deadlines for a bit. All to the good, that.
Sadly, and it does make me oh so sad, all the all meant that I didn’t have time to do interviews for the Winter Blog Blast Tour this time around. But I’ll be linking as it goes all next week anyway, because there’s some fabulous interviews lined up by my more industrious, better organized compadres. You would be remiss not to check them.