Books

The other day I mentioned a couple of books I’m looking foward to in 2006; several of you chimed in with your own anticipatory recommendations. Herewith, a chronicle of them:

Dave Schwartz – Brings it right off the bat with Jeff Ford’s The Empire of Ice Cream and Doug Lain’s Last Week’s Apocalypse (both story collections).

Justin Steiner – Seconds The Empire of Ice Cream and raises Michael Chabon’s The Yiddish Policemen’s Union (unfortunately, now not due until 2007 – Chabon discusses the delay here) and Colson Whitehead’s Apex Hides the Hurt.

Chris McLaren – Jumps in and thirds the Ford then adds Justina Robson’s Living Next Door to the God of Love, Mary Gentle’s Ilario: The Lion’s Eye and Scott Westerfeld’s Midnighters 3: Blue Noon (the awesomeness of which I can personally vouch for).

Niall Harrison – Enters stage left and says he’s not thinking about 2006 books yet, but can vouch for the Robson and that he’s looking forward to Ian Macleod’s Past Magic (collection) from PS Publishing.

Marrije – Throws a vote to the new Chabon (sadly no longer on the ballot) and adds Caitlin Kiernan’s Daughter of Hounds (no release date yet, that I could find; which may mean it’s due in 2007) and Justine Larbalestier’s Magic Lessons (another one I can personally vouch for — it’s AMAZING). (She also throws in a vote for the third book in the Magic or Madness Trilogy: Magic Magic Magic Oi Oi Oi, but that one is another 2007 book to look forward to.)

John Klima – Boldly puts his titles in a different thread, but the judge is accepting them anyway. He throws in some new blood with Barth Anderson’s The Patron Saint of Plagues, Jeff VanderMeer’s Shriek: An Afterword and Hal Duncan’s Vellum. He also mentions that a bunch of books he was excited about came out this year: Jeff Ford’s The Girl in the Glass, Alex Irvine’s The Narrows, Tim Pratt’s The Strange Adventures of Rangergirl and Jay Caselberg’s The Star Tablet.

My own most highly anticipated titles, which kicked all this off, are Geoff Ryman’s The King’s Last Song and Alan DeNiro‘s Skinny Dipping in the Lake of the Dead. And, coincidentally, I’m also excited about everything listed above. A few additions: Kevin Brockmeier’s A Brief History of the Dead, Cecil Castellucci’s The Queen of Cool (I want you to have read it so we can talk about it), Sharyn November’s new anthology Firebirds Rising, Paul Park’s The Tourmaline (due the day before my birthday), and it looks like Margo Lanagan’s previous collection White Time will be released in the U.S. this summer. And a bunch of other stuff I’m forgetting or don’t even know about yet.

If anybody else wants to throw some shoulder, I’ll keep updating this post for a week or so.

Go, Maureen, go!

Three collections of stories, from a writing heavyweight, a small-press author and an Irish immigrant, have been named finalists for the second annual Story Prize, a $20,000 award for short fiction that will be presented after a reading by the authors at the New School in Manhattan on Jan. 25. The finalists are Jim Harrison, the acclaimed novelist, poet and essayist, for "The Summer He Didn’t Die," three novellas published by Atlantic Monthly Press; Maureen F. McHugh, best known for her science fiction novels, for "Mothers & Other Monsters," 13 stories published by Small Beer Press of Northampton, Mass.; and Patrick O’Keeffe, a lecturer at the University of Michigan who immigrated to the United States from Ireland in the mid-1980’s, for "The Hill Road," four stories published by Viking.

Yay!

The judges are Nancy Pearl, Andrea Barrett and James Wood (attenTION!).

Stop by Maureen’s blog and congratulate her wildly!

p.s. Pressing question: what does the F. stand for? Inquiring minds …

So, there’s a little discussion going on over at the new and already extremely useful Metaxu Cafe’s forums about whether blogging is dead. The consensus seems to be no, and the question has branched into whether blogging is sexy. It’s also referenced the endless "Novels Are Dead" statements that pop up from time to time. I’ve been reading* Jane Smiley’s 13 Ways of Looking at the Novel and found her comments on this subject interesting enough to post them here:

When we talk about the death of the novel, what we are really talkign about is the possibility that empathy, however minimal, would no longer be attainable by those for whom the novel has died. If the novel has died for the bureaucrats who run our country, then they are more likely not to pause before engaging in arrogant, narcissistic, and foolish policies. If the novel has died for men (and some publishers and critics say that men read fewer novels than they used to), then the inner lives of their friends and family members are a degree more closed to them than before. If the novel dies, or never lives, for children and teenagers who spend their time watching TV or playing video games, then they will always be somewhat mystified by others, and by themselves as well. If the novel should die, what is to replace it?

My guess is that mere technology will not kill the novel. It is too different from movies and other forms of visual entertainment to be replaced by them. Nor do I believe that novels are bannable. Too many of them reside in private hands; they would be as hard to get rid of as guns and bullets. But novels can be sidelined–dismissed to the seraglio, where they are read by women and children and have no effect on those in power. When that happens, our society will be brutalized and coarsened by people who speak rather like us and look rather like us but who have no way of understanding us or each other.

*Passages such as this I am reading and loving; I must admit to skimming some of the more lengthy analyses of individuals novels to make a point. But overall, well worth a look.

Disrupting the Season of Lists for a few moments, my most anticipated title of next year: The King’s Last Song by Geoff Ryman. Due in February 2006 (in the UK anyway, but then, that’s what Amazon.co.uk is for; plus, 30 percent off). Sez the description:

A great king brings peace to a warring nation. Centuries later his writings will bring hope to those facing the tragic legacy of modern Cambodia’s bloody history. When archaeologists discover a book written on gold leaves at Angkor Wat, everyone wants a piece of the action. But the King, the Army and the UN are all outflanked when the precious artefact is kidnapped, along with Professor Luc Andrade, who was accompanying it to the capital for restoration. Luckily for Luc his love and respect for Cambodia have won him many friends, including ex-Khmer Rouge cadre Map and the young moto-boy William. Both equally determined to rescue the man they consider their mentor and recover the golden book, they form an unlikely bond. But William is unaware of just how closely Map’s violent past affects him. The book contains the words and wisdom of King Jayavarman VII, the Buddhist ruler who united a war-torn Cambodia in the twelfth century and together with his enlightened wife created a kingdom that was a haven of peace and learning. His extraordinary story is skilfully interwoven with the tales of Luc, Map and William to create an unforgettable and dazzling evocation of the spirit of Cambodia.

Wow, that sounds amazing.

A close second (a nanosecond), by the by, is Alan DeNiro‘s Skinny Dipping in the Lake of the Dead — and it’s only second because I’ve already read some of the stories in it.

(Feel free to shout out any you’re waiting for in the comments.)

Rain Taxi’s having an auction to celebrate their ten year anniversary. Go buy some stuff.

(Via Alan and Kristin.)

Toni tagged me (after Pooks tagged her), in the writing fifteen things about books meme. The results (and who I tag) are behind the cut.

…

15 Things About BooksRead More »

Among a bevy of Book World lists, the WaPo names its top novels for children from 2005, including Carol Emshwiller’s Mister Boots (yay!) and Rafe Martin’s Birdwing.

Coincidentally, those are the next two books I plan to read. Along with the Geoff Ryman story in the previous issue of F&SF. Followed by The Cosmology of the Wider World by Jeff Ford, several LBC titles, Jeff VanderMeer’s ShriekVeniss Underground (my mind transposed the two), Walter Dean Myers’ Autobiography of My Dead Brother, Karen Fisher’s A Sudden Country and Robb Forman Dew’s Truth of the Matter — not necessarily in that order, and with a bunch of other things in the line-up too, but not currently in the stack right next to me where I can see them. I imagine I’ll continue reading 13 Ways of Looking at the Novel through all this. Oh, and I need to pick Lydia Millet’s Oh Pure and Radiant Heart back up and finish it too.

Basically, I plan a readery December, as I get back into the Roanoke research and start pecking out new words on that long-neglected book.

p.s. Apparently, only two writers got the memo that the WaPo would be looking favorably on novels with the word march in the title this year. Any guesses about the magic word for 2006?

Oh my. On a lark, I set up the DVR to grab the Quill Awards, figuring hilarity would ensue if nothing else. (It was being broadcast during the afternoon on Sunday, obviously a posh time slot.)

Best I can tell, the only good books are the ones written by celebrities. Also, celebrities haven’t read any books since high school (Matthew "Old Man and the Sea" Modine, Catherine "To Kill a Mockingbird" Crier*). Elmo was there. And Kim Cattrall’s and Candace Bushnell’s boobs. CLASSY.

I might try to watch more; I might not.

*I didn’t say they were A list celebrities.

The Guardian has come up with the Top 20 geek novels. Morrow Planet has memed it up. Bold the ones you’ve read.

My answers behind the cut.

…

Hey GeekyRead More »

Jenny Davidson recently reviewed Stephen King’s The Colorado Kid, notes a possible inconsistency and is left with a q:

In my review I mention the fact that a Denver Starbucks features–impossibly–in an inset tale set in 1980; after writing the review the first weekend in September and sending it off, I then saw a similar criticism at The Complete Review. They subsequently offered the following update (I’ve taken some liberties with the formatting, for clarification of what’s quoted from where):

Update: The official Stephen King site offers a Continuity Clarification from Stephen (scroll down to 7 October entry):

"The review of The Colorado Kid in today’s issue of today’s USA Today mentions that there was no Starbucks in Denver in 1980. Don’t assume that’s a mistake on my part. The constant readers of the Dark Tower series may realize that that is not necessarily a continuity error, but a clue."

If it is a clue, we still can’t figure out for what.

I can’t figure it out either (and haven’t read the Dark Tower at all, let alone being a constant reader).

Surely someone out there knows the answer? (If you don’t, I’ll have to stop thinking of you as All Knowing and All Powerful.