Gwenda

Killer Serials

As y'all know, there's nothing I like more than a good process discussion. So for the past few days I've been reading with great interest the posts at the Fangs, Fur, & Fey livejournal community, where a bunch of authors have been posting their responses to the question of the month, "How did you plan the last novel you wrote (and successfully finished)? Outline? Synopsis? Summary? Divination Rod? Nuthin' at all?" (Here's links to a few, and you can seek them all out using the link above: Laura Anne Gilman's, Maggie Stiefvater's, Janni Simner's, and Megan Crewe's.)

This all falls under the category of when you're thinking about something, suddenly you see it everywhere. One thing I'm trying to do as I approach my next book (or what I'm fairly certain is my next book) is give it a little more cooking on the front end. My process seems to be shifting over time to allow more planning, with the caveat that the story still sometimes manages to jump tracks and end up somewhere completely different. I have no expectation that I'll ever completely eliminate that track-jumping, at least not in the smaller sense, and I don't really want to. What I do want to try to do is get more of a feel for the story, the world, and the characters before I start actually constructing them on the page.

So I've been thinking about that–stopping myself from actually starting the book, as is my usual modus operandi–and slowing down and letting the pieces come together a bit more first. I'm sure this won't actually turn out to be that slow a process, since I also believe that too much planning can be useless or, worse, detrimental. Witness all the research I did on Aztecs and the Romani in the earliest of early drafts of what was to eventually become a book that uses only Greek mythology (the book I just finished). Now, that stuff will come in handy–in fact, I expect some of it will come in handy on the project I'm doing all the thinking about. But I certainly didn't end up needing it for the last book, so I'll be doing my researching as I go this time. Because despite all this front-end work, I still thoroughly expect that I won't know exactly what I might need to research until I get into the placing of one word after another.

Which brings me to the second thing I've been thinking about–what are the elements that seem to be common to successful series? By series here I mean both open-ended series with lots of books and the more traditional trilogy; for my purposes, the key elements would likely be the same. I'm thinking the next thing I write might be such a trilogy, and that also necessitates more planning up front, at least in theory. Here's what I've come up with so far, and then you smartypants can (hopefully) add or comment on things I missed.

Killer Serials Read More »

Weekend Update

I decided–perhaps foolishly–to join in Maureen Johnson's Blog Every Day in April*. Ye olde Shaken & Stirred has been a bit cobweb-encrusted lately, and I've managed to slay the major cluster of attacking deadlines, so it seemed like a good time to be wooed away from the tiny noncommittal updates of twitter and back here a bit more often. I actually intend to do more Real Posts this month, as opposed to link round-ups. 

That said, we've had a willy nilly kind of weekend and I can't think of a good topic I could manage to be enlightening–over even cogent–on. (I suppose if there is something you'd like me to post about or a question you have, you could leave it in the comments or send it via e-mail and I'll give it a shot sometime this month.) SO I'll just natter about the weekend, thus meeting the commitment but with minimal thinking required. Everyone wins. 

Friday evening we drove up to Cincinnati, because the outrageously fabulous Cassie Clare was coming through on her City of Glass reading and signing tour (with Lisa McMann) and we don't get to see her that often. After her throngs of fans (see phone-grabbed photo below that does not begin to capture how many teens were in attendance) cleared out, we got to grab some Chinese food and have some quality time. 

Noname 

Highlights of the evening included: random very nice fan who asked if I was Holly Black (ha!); buying books (including Rita Williams-Garcia's Jumped, which I am so very excited about after hearing her read excerpts from it during my grad school residencies, and Shaun Tan's Tales from Outer Suburbia, which is GORGEOUS); explaining why there was such a crowd to the asocial freak at the bar (not really a highlight); and cheering the world domination of the Mortal Instruments series. But mostly it was just really nice to see Cassie.

Saturday we drove out to the farmlands and today we gamed and now big bad thunderstorms are swinging through. Busy busy, as I said, but not in a bad way. Oh, and I finished rereading Graceling. Such a great book. Happy sigh.

*Apparently those days at the beginning I didn't manage it don't count, because I hadn't signed up yet. I love an event with amnesty. 

Weekend Update Read More »

Race Relations

The fabulous Mitali Perkins has a truly exceptional article at School Library Journal, "Straight Talk on Race: Challenging Stereotypes in Kids' Books." While it is, obviously, focused on work for children and young adults, it's worth a read for anyone writing for any audience. I'd extract a snippet, but, really, seriously, just go read the whole thing.

Updated: And some additional comments–and a challenge–at Mitali's blog.

Race Relations Read More »

Monday Hangovers

Monday Hangovers Read More »

The Last Word

Just checked out the latest bracketology at the Tourney of Books from my corona-virus induced stint on the fainting couch. I'm kind of glad we're to be spared Frankie vs. The Bolano That Ate Contemporary Letters (assuming it survives its own zombie round match-up).

Anyway, my favorite Meghan leaves a spot on comment* following the latest clueless judging of The Disreputable History of Frankie Laundau Banks. A snippet:

Wow, it has taken me a long time to write this comment. Let me put it this way: Frankie inspires so much passion because it is one of the few contemporary books that I can think of (admittedly, completely off-hand) that addresses the seemingly-small, but daily, ways in which women are expected to minimize their own strengths in order to please men. And, yes, it's a book about a fifteen-year-old girl, but as any former fifteen-year-olds can tell you, that is the time when these dynamics start to manifest in force. It's also when they're the most powerful. I mean, who is more slavishly devoted to gender roles than a high school sophomore? Except the editors of Cosmo and certain screenwriters? And that fifteen-year-old self is always lurking around somewhere, ready to rear his or her head again. Especially when it comes to love.

I also think it telling that Lockhart's completely contemporary and absolutely inspired use of omniscient narration, the very thing that elevates the story to the level Meghan talks about, is something neither of the judges seemed to notice. But, again, probably best to read the commentary (bless you, guys) and skip the judging, for mental health's sake. 

*Disagree a teensy bit about the ending, but that's a discussion for the next time we're having drinks. Frankie for President.

The Last Word Read More »

Tuesday Hangovers

Tuesday Hangovers Read More »

Scroll to Top